AI Vibe Check
Does this sound a little too polished?
Find the writing patterns behind that feeling.
Pasted text stays in this tab. No uploads, accounts, or saved samples.
Loading the checker. If this message stays here, reload the page or check whether your browser blocked its scripts.
Enter a public HTTPS article URL, or use Paste text.
Review the extracted text
This measures recognizable writing patterns. It is a style score, not proof of who or what wrote the text.
What raised the score
Counter-signals
Other matched signals
The strongest five signals appear above. These also contributed to the score and highlighted passages.
Your text, with the clues marked
Marked passages can match several signals. Their descriptions name each matching clue; a mark does not establish authorship.
How the rubric works
A transparent set of writing rules looks for formulaic phrasing, repeated structure, even sentence rhythm, abstract language, familiar rhetorical turns, and transition signposting. Concrete details and personal observations can lower the score.
Each family has a cap so repeated clues do not dominate. Counter-signals subtract up to 20 points. The combined score stays between 0 and 100. It is not a probability of AI authorship: people use these patterns, and AI can avoid them.
- 0–19
- Distinctly human energy
- 20–39
- Mostly human vibes
- 40–59
- Honestly, could go either way
- 60–79
- Suspiciously polished
- 80–100
- Maximum chatbot energy
English prose only. The language check is approximate. Lists, quotations, specialist writing, and short samples can skew the result. Use this to reflect on style, never to accuse someone of using AI.